Made up a couple of cute moral dilemma situations. As usual I made them up elsewhere, and now bring them here to my own corner, second hand...
* Goblins have stolen chickens from the local village and taken them to
their cave. However, after traversing some traps, the PC finds that the
goblins children are starving. If any attempt to arrange a food supply
is made, evidence shows up that the goblins used to hunt and forage
around the surrounding area (for insects and mice - yuck! But goblins
love 'em (them and Bear Grylls)) until the village took over their lands
for pasture. Who is the invader?
* A giant beast is rampaging
around the outer perimeter of the town, wrecking barns and fences and
killing sheep that graze out that way. On encountering the beast, the PC
finds it can talk - it has a barb in it that it can't remove but the PC
can. However, it informs the PC that it looks forward to removal,
because then it'll be strong enough to smash that village that done it
wrong so long ago. So, leave the beast in pain? Or kill it - even though
it can talk as much as you can? Try and talk it out of smashing the
village, knowing that if it lies and you remove the barb and it then it
goes on to smash the village - well, that's kind of your fault? Or is
it?
No comments:
Post a Comment